EA

EX-YU Aviation Newspage 2

25 aviation articlesexyuaviation.com ↗

Coverage, page 2

page 2 of 2

Air Dolomiti schedules Zagreb launch

NEWS FLASH Air Dolomiti has scheduled flights between Munich and Zagreb from October 25, before fully replacing parent company Lufthansa on the route from January 1, 2027. As exclusively reported by EX-YU Aviation News early last month , Air Dolomiti will launch a daily service between the two cities at the start of the 2026/27 winter season, operating alongside six weekly Lufthansa mainline flights. From January 1, Lufthansa will suspend its own services, leaving Air Dolomiti as the sole Lufthansa Group carrier on the route until early March. The airline will operate the flights on behalf of its parent company, but under its own flight numbers and airline designator code. Tickets can be purchased via Lufthansa's website. EX-YU Aviation News

EAEX-YU Aviation NewsEX-YU Aviation (noreply@blogger.com)7 Sept

Lufthansa reverses Discover deployment to Belgrade

NEWS FLASH Lufthansa has reversed its recent decision to deploy subsidiary Discover Airlines on services between Munich and Belgrade during the upcoming winter season. The German carrier now plans to operate thirteen weekly flights between the two cities using its own mainline fleet. Previously, Discover Airlines, Lufthansa’s leisure subsidiary, had been scheduled to operate the Munich - Belgrade route on behalf of Lufthansa. However, the flights would have carried Discover Airlines’ own flight numbers and airline designator code. EX-YU Aviation News

EAEX-YU Aviation NewsEX-YU Aviation (noreply@blogger.com)7 Sept

Ljubljana Airport posts busiest month as United lifts ambitions

Ljubljana Airport registered its busiest month on record in August, handling 222.958 passengers. The figure represents an increase of 19.7% on the same month last year and is 5.3% above the previous record set in August 2019, when Adria Airways was still in operation and the airport welcomed 211.595 travellers. “This comparison is important, but the number alone does not tell the full story. Today, Ljubljana Airport’s growth is supported by a broad and diversified airline portfolio, strong connectivity and close cooperation with our airline and tourism partners. This makes the achievement not only historic, but also strategically significant for the future development of the airport”, the airport’s CEO, Jürgen Deischl, said. Ljubljana's largest airlines by scheduled seat capacity, August 2026 The recently announced seasonal service between Newark and Ljubljana, which United Airlines will launch next year, has not only raised the airport’s ambitions but also changed the way it can position and market itself to other carriers. Speaking to the “Bloomberg Adria” network, Mr Deischl noted, “New York for us changes the scale of our ambition but it does not complete it. We are working on additional European and international connectivity, stronger frequencies and further strategic opportunities for next year. We will not speculate about airlines or destinations now, but we will announce those flights as soon as they are ready to take off”. Commenting further about the United service, the CEO noted, “The commercial case was compelling. We have a significantly underserved market. We have a cross-boarder catchment of around five million and approximately 200.000 American visitors expected this year without a nonstop connection. So, in a remarkably short time, we turned that potential together with United into a credible and executable business case. Ultimately, the decision was United’s, and we are absolutely delighted with it. We expect more than 40.000 passengers to use this route during the next summer season. However., the opportunity goes well beyond the passenger numbers. A nonstop service changes how a destination is received, sold and assessed”. He added, “Our responsibility as an airport is to create conditions for a strong performance from day one and to build the foundation for a lasting service”. EX-YU Aviation News

EAEX-YU Aviation NewsEX-YU Aviation (noreply@blogger.com)6 Sept

TRIP REPORT: TAROM, Belgrade - Bucharest

Trip Report Last week, I flew TAROM from Belgrade to Bucharest. It was my first time with the airline, although I have travelled between the two cities several times this year, each time with Air Serbia. This time around, I chose TAROM because its 9AM departure suited me much better than Air Serbia’s two flights that day - one just after midnight and the other in the early afternoon. I had an unrelated onward flight from Bucharest with another airline, so the TAROM service was really the only practical option. I could have taken Air Serbia’s midnight departure, but I did not particularly feel like flying in the middle of the night and then spending around twelve hours in Bucharest. I booked the flight roughly two weeks in advance. A one-way ticket without checked luggage cost 90 euros, while adding a bag would have been another 50 euros. TAROM was also selling business class on the ATR for something like 350 euros. I chose the light fare, remembering at the last minute that I still had SkyTeam status through Kenya Airways as a result of a status match I had done with another programme several years ago. That meant I was entitled to complimentary checked luggage. I was also lucky because my tier status was due to expire just a few days after this flight. I thought there might be an issue explaining to the Belgrade Airport check-in agent that I was entitled to free luggage through this status, and I was not particularly convinced it would be honoured. However, I need not have worried. I arrived at the airport two hours before departure and, for the first time in quite a while, it was remarkably peaceful. It was just after Air Serbia’s morning wave, leaving a roughly two-hour period during which there are comparatively few departures. There were around ten people ahead of me at check-in. To my surprise, the agent immediately mentioned that I had status without me having to say anything. She apologised that she did not have a priority baggage tag at her desk and offered to go to the KLM counter to get one, which I told her was obviously unnecessary. She also said she would block the seat next to me, although she noted that there were only 25 passengers booked on the ATR 72-600. This was quite a contrast to all four Air Serbia flights I have taken to or from Bucharest this year, all of which were full to the very last seat. Admittedly, those were all afternoon services. Before heading through passport control and security, both of which were quick, I had a short walk around the airport. The new cafés that appear ready to open are still closed, including the WHSmith shop, although I did notice some progress in Terminal 1, where it looks like several new cafés and restaurants are being prepared. The aircraft arrived in Belgrade slightly behind schedule, although the delay was not significant. It parked opposite Terminal 1. A China Southern Boeing 787 was also parked across the terminal at the time and was later towed to the gate, as the aircraft has several hours on the ground between arrival and departure. Boarding took place from gate A7A, followed by a very short bus ride to the ATR. There were two middle-aged female cabin crew members, neither of whom was particularly welcoming, although that was hardly an issue. Boarding was completed quickly and I overheard the crew saying there were 23 passengers onboard, meaning there had presumably been two no-shows. I was seated in the second-last row. There was one passenger in business class and I was somewhat surprised to see that TAROM places its business class in row one. During the Jat era, business class on the ATR was located in the final two rows, which Air Serbia still sells as preferred seating today. That arrangement always made sense to me because those rows are closest to the aircraft’s exit, lavatory and galley. It was also interesting to see that TAROM has a proper curtain separating business class from economy. Later during the flight, I saw one of the crew members bring the business class passenger a large, full meal tray - it actually looked bigger than the tray table itself. The passenger declined it and the crew member returned with the tray seconds later. Still, the whole setup felt very old school, in a good way. As for us, we were provided with a packaged cup of water. There does seem to be a buy on board menu, but it was not offered on this flight. The flight itself was smooth and uneventful, lasting around one hour and fifteen minutes. I spent some time looking through TAROM’s inflight magazine and was surprised by just how small the airline’s network has become. I am aware of the financial difficulties TAROM has faced over the years, but I have never really followed the airline closely. The lavatory was small, as is standard on ATRs, but it was clean and, thankfully, odourless. Bucharest Airport remains a complete mystery to me. In my personal opinion, it makes Belgrade Airport look like Changi. It seems to consist of various buildings, or at least what feel like various buildings, connected by numerous elevated corridors and air bridges. Passport control, both on arrival and departure, has somehow been placed in some of the narrowest sections of the terminal. The camera used at passport control is positioned so low that many passengers actually have to bend down for their photo to be taken. That said, I have found the Romanian border police to be very friendly on every occasion I have passed through the airport, unlike their colleagues in Belgrade. Perhaps I have simply been lucky. Once you leave baggage reclaim, there is around a ten-minute walk to reach the check-in hall, which is in another part of the airport and connected by yet another elevated corridor. Departures have their own problems. Every passenger has to scan their boarding pass before entering the security area, but the scanners are positioned in such a way that queues for them mix with the queues of passengers checking in nearby. At busy times of the day, it becomes quite a mess. Passport control for non-Schengen departures is again situated in a narrow section of the building, while the non-TAROM lounge is somehow worse than the Belgrade Airport lounge, which says quite a lot. I simply find the airport and its infrastructure surprisingly poor considering the volume of traffic it handles. Overall, TAROM was perfectly fine for such a short flight. I am glad I had the opportunity to try the airline before it discontinues its Belgrade service next month. The very light load on this particular flight might offer some indication as to why the route is being dropped, although obviously no conclusions can really be drawn from a single one-way journey. Share your travel experience by submitting a trip report to exyu@exyuaviation.com EX-YU Aviation News

EAEX-YU Aviation NewsEX-YU Aviation (noreply@blogger.com)6 Sept

Air Montenegro and Air Serbia enter flight frequency battle

Air Montenegro and Air Serbia have engaged in a frequency battle this week, with both carriers increasing their planned services between the two countries for the upcoming 2026/27 winter season, which begins on October 25. Air Montenegro now plans to operate eighteen weekly flights between Podgorica and Belgrade, up from the initially scheduled fourteen. The carrier will run three daily services between the two capitals on Mondays, Thursdays, Fridays and Sundays. Earlier this week, Air Serbia also increased frequencies on the route to 27 weekly, adding a fourth daily service from Monday through Saturday. As EX-YU Aviation News learns, Air Montenegro is also considering further increasing frequencies between Tivat and Belgrade. The carrier has already boosted services from seven weekly last winter to ten this year. This was followed by Air Serbia, which added an additional daily flight between the two cities, bringing its total to 21 weekly. Based on current schedules, Serbia and Montenegro will be linked by 76 weekly flights this winter, comprising 45 between Belgrade and Podgorica and 31 between Belgrade and Tivat. Flights linking Belgrade with Podgorica and Tivat continue to generate the highest passenger volumes among routes within the former Yugoslav markets. The two routes handled a combined 685.316 passengers in 2025, representing an increase of 6.6% on the previous year, or an additional 42.389 travellers. Belgrade - Podgorica remained the busiest intra-ex-YU route, with Air Serbia and Air Montenegro jointly carrying 356.896 passengers, up 9.4% year-on-year. Meanwhile, Belgrade - Tivat handled 328.420 travellers, an increase of 3.7%. Belgrade was Podgorica’s busiest route in 2025, ahead of Istanbul with 290.827 passengers. It was also Tivat’s largest market, ahead of Tel Aviv, which recorded 201.531 travellers. EX-YU Aviation News

EAEX-YU Aviation NewsEX-YU Aviation (noreply@blogger.com)5 Sept